Tonight brothersparks are embarking on our first co-authored post. ‘Co-authored’? you may ask. Well, if it worked for Loggins and Messina, we certainly think it is acceptable for this blog. Today we post on a subject that has been near and dear to our hearts for the better part of two decades. Our beloved Channel 4 Padres. That’s right. To us, it will always be known as Channel 4 PADRES. The subject du jour is our new television personality, a gentleman by the name of Mark Neely. Neely, of course, is Channel 4’s new play-by-play guy replacing the dearly departed Matt Vasgersian who left for presumably greener pastures at MLB network.
Before weighing in on this ‘controversy’, we would like to take a trip down memory lane and give our critique of Channel 4 past and present. As our bullpen slams another nail in the coffin of this young season, we harken back to Channel 4’s fledgling first days when Mel Proctor and Rick Sutcliffe first graced our airwaves.

Mel Proctor was the prototypical ‘just the facts’ play-by-play guy who, according to his official voice123 profile, has ‘good range deep/masculine to soft and sensitive’ capabilities when it comes to recording services (*Mr. Sexy Mel Proctor Photo also courtesy of voice123). In case you are in the market for a voice actor who can perform in roles ranging from ‘middle aged male’ to ’senior male’, Mel has been registered on voice123 since March of 2004 and is apparently still actively seeking employment. Rick Sutcliffe is beloved to us San Diegans for gagging away the 1984 NLCS as a member of the Chicago Cubs, giving the Padres their first of two embarrassing World Series appearances. Sutcliffe gave way to Mark Grant in 1997, but was perhaps best remembered for bursting into the broadcast booth in 2006 after 9 holes of golf with Bill Murray-and what was apparently an open bar at the clubhouse- leading to the following exchange:
Sut: Mud, you’re the best, man. Anybody on Earth that doesn’t like Mark Grant… They got… They got problems. Matty! What’re you still doing here in San Diego?
Matt: [interrupting] Red Baron, you were… Hey, by the way, you were…
Sut: [cross-talk] Matty!
Matt: …the answer to a trivia question earlier.
Sut: No-no-no, Matty.
Matt: We were… We were at Dodgers Stadium…
Sut: Everybody on Earth has been trying to steal you.
Matt: We were at Dodgers Stadium…
Sut: The Dodgers, the Cubs. ESPN.
Matt: Two weeks ago?
Sut: What’re you still doing here?
Yes he may have been drunk, but he was prescient, touching on both the ongoing Mark Grant controversy (the authors of this posting are HUGE fans) and the inevitable departure of Matt Vasgersian in 2009. In 2002, Vasgersian and Grant formed San Diego’s most beloved television duo since Simon & Simon (yes, Gmunz is OLD). The Vasgersian-Grant years were truly a renaissance in San Diego sportscasting (with all due respect to uncle teddy).

As they traded verbal jabs, bandied about pop-cultural references, coined new phrases and threw in gratuitous plugs for Valley View Casino and Sunglass and Optical Warehouse, the one thing you always took away from their broadcasts was that they loved their job and genuinely seemed to like each other. While some argued Grant was a windbag or Vasgersian seemed to be straining a bit too much to showcase his cultural relevance, brothersparks always found such critiques nit-picky and unfounded. One needs to understand how gawd-awful the Padres are most seasons to gain a true appreciation for the accomplishment it was for these two to keep the broadcasts consistently entertaining.

The departure of Vasgersian ushered in a new era for Channel 4: The Neely-Grant years. Truth be told, the original impetus for this post was a comical attempt at journalism on the part of the San Diego Union-Tribune entitled ‘All quiet on the feedback front for Neely’. Really? In a day and age where newspapers have a mortality rate rivaling ischemic cardiovascular disease do they really need to be writing articles where the headline essentially blares “No news here!’ But we digress. In the article (linked here http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/apr/24/1s24mediacol22134-all-quiet-feedback-front-neely/), Channel 4 station manager Dennis Morgigno explains there have been a spattering of e-mails from viewers, the majority of which have been positive. Do we believe him? On the one hand, he’s the station manager for Channel 4, so what’s he going to say? That everybody hates the new guy? On the other hand we tend to believe he’s telling the truth because…we happen to agree with the viewers. Brothersparks have been subjecting themselves to Padres baseball since opening day and the repartee between Neely and Grant continues to improve. In one instance earlier in the week Neely was even chiding Grant for his road trip eating habits. Grant somehow managed to parlay this exchange into yet another gratuitous Valley View Casino Buffet plug and at that moment you almost forgot the two of them had only been working together for a few months. Remember, Vasgersian and Grant had seven years to perfect their on-air odd couple routine, so it’s nice to see Neely and Grant warming up to each other in such short order. The word being used by many to describe Neely is ‘understated’, but parksabouts are not so sure they agree. He certainly doesn’t belt out a Vasgersian-like ‘Santa Maria’! with every home run, but he has shown a flair for the dramatic when the moment calls. However, given that the Padres have lost 10 of their last 12 and scored 1 run in their last 19 innings, Neely may spend much of this season being ‘understated’ through no fault of his own. As a matter of fact, perhaps the quality of the baseball being played is the reason why, once again, the booth is the most intriguing part of the Padres game broadcasts.